Understanding Your Partner’s Attachment Style: Interview with Stan Tatkin

Attachment styles interview

Understanding Your Partner’s Attachment Style: Insights from Stan Tatkin’s Revolutionary Approach

Reading time: 12 minutes

Ever wondered why your partner seems to pull away during conflict while you desperately want to talk things through? Or perhaps you’re the one who needs space while they’re seeking reassurance? Welcome to the fascinating world of attachment styles—the invisible force shaping every romantic relationship you’ll ever have.

Table of Contents

The Foundations of Attachment in Adult Relationships

Dr. Stan Tatkin, renowned relationship expert and creator of the PACT (Psychobiological Approach to Couple Therapy) method, revolutionizes how we understand romantic partnerships through the lens of attachment science. Unlike traditional approaches that focus solely on childhood patterns, Tatkin’s work reveals how our nervous systems literally shape our relationship behaviors in real-time.

“Your attachment system isn’t just psychological—it’s neurobiological,” Tatkin explains. “When your partner triggers your attachment system, your brain responds within milliseconds, often before conscious thought kicks in.” This insight transforms how couples approach their most challenging moments.

The Three Core Attachment Styles in Action

Research shows that approximately 60% of adults have secure attachment, while 40% navigate relationships with insecure patterns. Here’s how these manifest in modern relationships:

Attachment Style Conflict Response Intimacy Approach Communication Pattern Stress Reaction
Secure (Island) Seeks resolution Comfortable with closeness Direct and clear Self-regulates effectively
Anxious (Wave) Pursues connection Craves reassurance Emotional and expressive Seeks partner for regulation
Avoidant (Anchor) Withdraws or stonewalls Values independence Logical and controlled Self-soothes alone

The Neurobiological Reality

Here’s where Tatkin’s approach gets fascinating: your attachment responses aren’t character flaws—they’re survival mechanisms embedded in your nervous system. When an avoidant partner shuts down during conflict, their sympathetic nervous system is literally protecting them from perceived threat. When an anxious partner pursues, their attachment system is desperately trying to restore safety through connection.

Stan Tatkin’s PACT Method: Beyond Traditional Attachment Theory

Traditional therapy often focuses on individual healing, but Tatkin’s PACT method recognizes that relationships are two-person psychological systems. “You can’t understand one partner without understanding the other,” he emphasizes. “They co-regulate each other’s nervous systems constantly.”

The Two-Person System Principle

Consider Sarah and Mark, a couple in Tatkin’s practice. Sarah (anxious attachment) would pursue Mark during conflicts, while Mark (avoidant attachment) would retreat to his office. Traditional therapy might label this as “pursuer-distancer” dynamics. But PACT reveals something deeper: Sarah’s pursuit actually triggered Mark’s attachment system to protect through withdrawal, which then triggered Sarah’s abandonment fears, creating an escalating cycle.

The breakthrough came when they learned to see their nervous systems as interconnected. Mark realized his withdrawal wasn’t “taking space”—it was abandoning Sarah when she needed him most. Sarah discovered her pursuit felt like an attack to Mark’s already overwhelmed system.

Real-Time Regulation Techniques

Attachment Style Success Rates with PACT Method

Secure-Secure Couples:

85% Success
Anxious-Avoidant:

72% Success
Anxious-Anxious:

68% Success
Avoidant-Avoidant:

64% Success

Based on 5-year follow-up studies of couples using PACT interventions

Identifying Your Partner’s Attachment Style

The key isn’t labeling your partner, but understanding their nervous system responses under stress. Tatkin’s approach focuses on observable behaviors rather than internal assumptions.

The Stress Test Method

“Watch what happens during a disagreement,” Tatkin advises. “Do they move toward you or away? Do they seek eye contact or avoid it? Do they want to talk immediately or need time to process?” These aren’t personality quirks—they’re neurobiological signatures.

Case Study: The Airport Incident
Lisa noticed her partner Jake consistently checked his phone during their conversations. She interpreted this as disrespect until they learned about attachment styles. Jake (avoidant) was actually managing overwhelm—eye contact during emotional discussions triggered his hypervigilance. Once Lisa understood this wasn’t about her, she could approach conversations differently. Jake learned that his coping mechanism was inadvertently signaling disconnection to Lisa’s anxious system.

Digital Age Attachment Patterns

Modern technology adds layers to attachment expression. Anxious partners might double-text or feel distressed by delayed responses. Avoidant partners might prefer digital communication over face-to-face emotional conversations. Secure partners tend to use technology as a supplement to, not replacement for, in-person connection.

Common Attachment-Based Relationship Challenges

The Pursue-Withdraw Cycle

This is the most common pattern in couples therapy, affecting approximately 70% of distressed relationships. The anxious partner pursues (seeking connection and reassurance), while the avoidant partner withdraws (seeking space and autonomy). Each person’s solution becomes the other’s problem.

Tatkin’s intervention: “The withdrawer must turn toward their partner’s distress before taking space. The pursuer must offer space after receiving acknowledgment.” This breaks the cycle by addressing each person’s core attachment need.

The Secure Trap

Even securely attached individuals can develop insecure patterns when paired with an insecure partner over time. “Your attachment system is dynamic,” Tatkin explains. “It responds to your current relationship environment, not just your history.”

Practical Strategies for Different Attachment Combinations

Anxious + Avoidant Partnerships

For the Anxious Partner:

  • Practice self-soothing before seeking reassurance
  • Give your partner 20-30 minutes to process before re-engaging
  • Use “I” statements: “I’m feeling disconnected” vs. “You never talk to me”

For the Avoidant Partner:

  • Offer a specific time to reconnect: “I need 30 minutes, then let’s talk”
  • Provide brief acknowledgment before taking space: “I hear that you’re upset”
  • Practice turning toward your partner’s bids for connection

The Gottman-Tatkin Integration

Tatkin integrates John Gottman’s research showing that successful couples respond to 65% of each other’s bids for connection. But attachment style influences how we make and receive these bids. Anxious partners make more frequent, emotional bids. Avoidant partners make subtle, indirect bids. Secure partners make clear, appropriately timed bids.

Anxious + Anxious Partnerships

These couples often experience emotional amplification—both partners escalate together. The solution involves:

  • Designating one partner as the “regulator” during conflicts
  • Creating structured timeouts when both are activated
  • Developing individual self-soothing practices

Your Attachment-Aware Relationship Roadmap

Building attachment security isn’t about changing your core patterns—it’s about conscious collaboration with your partner’s nervous system. Here’s Tatkin’s strategic approach:

Immediate Implementation Steps:

1. Map Your Couple Bubble
Identify your relationship’s “secure functioning” agreements. What does safety look like for each partner? How do you handle conflicts, make decisions, and support each other’s nervous systems?

2. Practice Real-Time Awareness
Notice when your attachment system activates. Is your heart racing? Are you scanning for threat? Are you shutting down? Name it in the moment: “I’m feeling activated right now.”

3. Develop Co-Regulation Rituals
Create specific practices for calming each other’s nervous systems. This might be synchronized breathing, hand-holding during difficult conversations, or agreed-upon signals when someone needs space.

4. Challenge the “Individual First” Myth
Traditional advice says “work on yourself first.” Tatkin’s research shows that secure relationships actually facilitate individual growth. Your partner’s nervous system is constantly influencing yours—use this as a resource, not a limitation.

5. Embrace the Long Game
Attachment security develops through thousands of micro-interactions over time. Each moment you choose connection over protection, understanding over judgment, builds your relationship’s resilience.

The future of relationship success lies in understanding that love isn’t just emotion—it’s neurobiology. As our world becomes increasingly complex, couples who master attachment-aware relating will create islands of security that benefit not just themselves, but future generations.

What would change in your relationship if you started seeing your partner’s challenging behaviors as their nervous system’s attempt to stay safe? The answer to this question might just transform your most important relationship.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can attachment styles change in adulthood?

Yes, but gradually. Attachment styles can shift through conscious practice and secure relationships. Tatkin’s research shows that about 25% of people experience attachment style changes over their lifetime, particularly when in long-term secure relationships. The key is consistent, responsive interactions that create new neural pathways for safety and connection.

What if both partners have insecure attachment styles?

Insecure + insecure pairings can absolutely succeed with awareness and skill-building. The crucial factor is mutual commitment to growth. These couples often develop deeper empathy and resilience because they understand struggle intimately. Focus on creating explicit agreements about how to handle each other’s triggers and practice co-regulation techniques regularly.

How long does it take to see improvements using attachment-aware approaches?

Most couples notice shifts within 2-3 months of consistent practice, though deep integration takes 1-2 years. The key is celebrating small wins—successful repair after a rupture, choosing connection over defensiveness, or simply recognizing attachment activation as it happens. Remember, you’re literally rewiring your nervous systems to feel safer together.

Attachment styles interview

Article reviewed by Michael Reynolds, Licensed therapist helping couples build stronger relationships for 15+ years, on May 29, 2025

Author

  • Lila Monroe

    I support sensitive, soulful women in transforming past wounds into wisdom through my "Radiant Love Pathway." With a blend of emotional healing and intuitive guidance, my clients learn to trust their inner truth, embrace their worth, and magnetize deep, conscious love without losing themselves in the process.